Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
Physical Address
304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124
The chairman of Samsung, Lee Jae-yong, was seen with a silent expression as the announcement of his management succession looms. This expression has sparked discussions on social media and has naturally formed a favorable public opinion. Many have expressed their liking towards the chairman’s modest and approachable demeanor, and the media has not overlooked this phenomenon. Despite previous controversies surrounding Samsung, a positive perception has been established.
Criticism has been raised regarding the media’s coverage of controversies related to Samsung. It has been accused of using unrelated rumors and focusing on political intentions rather than the essence of the issues. This approach has hindered the formation of a positive public opinion towards Lee Jae-yong, especially as the first-instance ruling on the “management succession suspicion” approaches. The media’s attitude seems to be repeating itself.
Shin Mi-hee, the Chief of Staff, has pointed out that the media is manipulating Lee Jae-yong’s image. It is alleged that the media is reporting trivial and insignificant matters to shape a positive image, thus potentially concealing the true nature of criminal acts that should be exposed through investigation and trial. Additionally, there have been suggestions that the government’s “pro-chaebol” policy continues to influence the situation.
Critics argue that Lee Jae-yong’s public image is limited to indulging in tteokbokki or playful memes, which is seen as insufficient. As the semiconductor market rapidly changes, there are calls for him to publicly disclose his goals, strategies, and decision-making processes as the CEO. Currently, his visits to production sites and schools are well-known, but his specific statements and choices regarding company management remain undisclosed, making it difficult to evaluate his performance.
A trial regarding Lee Jae-yong’s merger with Jeil Industries and the legal implications is scheduled for January 26th. The prosecution claims that Samsung’s merger was unfairly conducted to support Lee Jae-yong’s stable management power, resulting in estimated losses for the National Pension Fund. Samsung, on the other hand, argues that the merger was a necessary business decision. There is also speculation that even if a guilty verdict is reached, the execution may be suspended according to the “3·5 Law.”
There is growing criticism of the media’s coverage of controversies related to Samsung and the alleged image manipulation of Lee Jae-yong. The media’s tendency to cover unrelated rumors and trivial matters has made it difficult to form a positive public opinion about the chairman. As the trial regarding the merger approaches, there is speculation that even if a guilty verdict is reached, the execution may be suspended according to the “3·5 Law.”
If you are curious about the source of the article, it is from Kyunghyang Shinmun.
If you’re wondering where the article came from!
#