Controversy Erupts Over “Pro-Assassin” Candidates in South Korean Election

Controversy Surrounds Candidacy of “Bimyeong-gye” Representative

A controversy has erupted over the candidacy of the representative from the “Bimyeong-gye” party. This controversy stems from the declaration of candidacy by “pro-assassin” candidates from the same party, leading to discussions of a “second round of candidate selection.”

Members of “Chinmun-gye” Party Declare Candidacy in “Anti-assassin” Constituencies

The “Chinmun-gye” party, also known as the “pro-assassin” camp, has faced criticism as its members declared their candidacy in constituencies where “anti-assassin” candidates are present. This move has sparked a new wave of controversy.

Leading Candidates and Their Declarations

Former lawmaker Jeong Bong-ju is at the forefront of the “pro-assassin” candidates. Jeong is set to officially declare his candidacy in the constituency of lawmaker Park Yong-jin. Jeong’s decision to run in this constituency stems from his dissatisfaction with Park’s political actions.

Another prominent figure in the “pro-assassin” camp, former lawmaker Yang Moon-seok, has also expressed his intention to run for office. Yang has challenged lawmaker Jeon Hae-cheol in the Gyeonggi Ansan Sangrok-gab constituency.

Kim Woo-young, the chairman of the Gangwon Provincial Party and the head of the “Minjung Party National Progressive Conference,” has also entered the race. Kim has officially declared his candidacy in the Seoul Eunpyeong-gu constituency, which is currently represented by lawmaker Kang Byung-won.

Backlash and Criticism

The “second round of candidate selection” has faced strong opposition from the “anti-assassin” camp. Critics argue that the “pro-assassin” candidates are motivated by revenge and a desire to eliminate betrayers rather than genuine political motives. They question the legitimacy of their candidacy, asking for evidence beyond personal vendettas.

On the other hand, the “pro-assassin” camp emphasizes the candidates’ right to choose their constituencies and the importance of respecting their political freedom as politicians.

Democratic Party’s Response

The Democratic Party’s leadership has taken a stance of adhering to the principles of “systematic candidate selection” and upholding party values. Party officials express concern that allowing candidates with controversy or disqualification reasons to participate in the preliminary elections will only intensify the controversy surrounding the “second round of candidate selection.”

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding the “second round of candidate selection” reveals deep divisions within the Democratic Party. As “pro-assassin” candidates declare their candidacy in “anti-assassin” constituencies, the party faces the significant challenge of managing internal conflicts and maintaining unity.

It remains to be seen how the Democratic Party will navigate this controversy and find a resolution that satisfies all factions within the party. The outcome will have implications for the upcoming elections and the party’s image and public perception.

Source: Dong-A Ilbo