Physical Address

304 North Cardinal St.
Dorchester Center, MA 02124

Controversy over “자객 출마” Deepens Political Divide in South Korea

Controversy over “자객 출마” Deepens Political Divide in South Korea
source : News-Type Korea

Controversy over “자객 출마” Intensifies Political Divide in South Korea

A recent controversy surrounding “자객 출마” (candidacy of pro-Moon Jae-in faction members) has deepened the political divide in South Korea between 친명계 (pro-Moon Jae-in faction) and 비명계 (anti-Moon Jae-in faction). The 친명계 인사들 (pro-Moon Jae-in faction members) declaring their candidacy in the constituencies of 비명계 현역 의원들 (anti-Moon Jae-in faction incumbent lawmakers) has sparked a potential “second internal conflict” within the party’s nomination process.

Strong Backlash from 비명계

The 비명계 (anti-Moon Jae-in faction) has strongly opposed the “자객 출마” of 친명계 인사들 (pro-Moon Jae-in faction members). One anti-Moon Jae-in faction lawmaker criticizes the party for facing serious aftermath even after the nominations. Another lawmaker questions the legitimacy of 친명계 자객 출마자들 (pro-Moon Jae-in faction candidates), arguing that their candidacy is driven solely by hatred and revenge without any valid reasons. 친명계 (pro-Moon Jae-in faction), however, counters that politicians should have the freedom to choose their constituencies.

Candidacy Declarations by 친명계 인사들

정봉주 전 의원 (former lawmaker Jeong Bong-ju) plans to declare his candidacy in the constituency of 비명계 박용진 의원 (anti-Moon Jae-in faction lawmaker Park Yong-jin). 양문석 전 방송통신위원회 상임위원 (former standing committee member of the Broadcasting and Communications Commission) expresses his intention to challenge in the Gyeonggi Province Ansan Sangrok-gab constituency. 김우영 강원도당위원장 (Kim Woo-young, Gangwon Provincial Party Chairman) officially announces his candidacy in Seoul Eunpyeong. These individuals have reportedly made their decisions based on the political consciousness of party members.

Party Leadership’s Stance

The party leadership emphasizes their commitment to the principles of “systematic nominations” and “primary elections.” They express concerns that controversies may arise if candidates receive nominations without going through the proper process or if there are disqualifications. Nonetheless, the controversy surrounding “자객 출마” continues between 친명계 and 비명계.

Political Sphere’s Attention

The political sphere is closely following the controversy surrounding the “자객 출마” between 친명계 and 비명계. While it is difficult to predict the resolution of this controversy and the decisions made during the nomination and primary processes, it is expected to further intensify the political atmosphere and electoral competition.

Deepening Divide between 친명계 and 비명계

The ongoing controversy over “자객 출마” is highlighting the clear divide between 친명계 and 비명계. This conflict between the two factions is expected to persist in the South Korean political landscape, leading to an intensified political climate and electoral competition.

Outlook on the “Second Internal Conflict” in Nominations

The “2차 공천 내전” (second internal conflict over nominations) between 친명계 and 비명계 is difficult to predict its future impact. However, this candidacy controversy is being evaluated as a significant event that could shape the course of South Korean politics. The political sphere and the public are expected to continue paying attention to this issue.

#

If you’re wondering where the article came from!
#