Controversial Burglary at Epstein Expert’s Office Raises Questions

Subtitle: Questions Arise Regarding the Connection Between the Burglary and Epstein-related Documents

A burglary at the Los Angeles office of Jeffrey Epstein’s former crisis management expert has sparked controversy and raised questions about its connection to Epstein-related documents. The burglary occurred at the office of Michael Sitrick, head of Sitrick & Company, a top global crisis PR firm, on January 2, just a day before court documents related to Epstein were set to be unsealed. Sitrick confirmed that thieves broke into the four-story building in Brentwood and stole office computers, specifically targeting those used by the unpaid department.

Sitrick emphasized that the burglary also targeted another office in the same building, highlighting the broader nature of the incident. He firmly denied any connection between the burglary and the unsealing of court documents, asserting that his own office was not burglarized and had no Epstein-related documents. Sitrick dismissed theories linking the burglary to the release of sealed court documents, stating that there could be no possible connection between the two events.

The Los Angeles Police Department responded to the burglary report, which indicated that the thieves smashed a glass door to gain entry into the building. However, the police spokesperson did not provide further details about the incident. Sitrick revealed that he had been working with Epstein since 2011, following an article about Epstein’s friendship with Prince Andrew. However, Sitrick terminated his professional relationship with Epstein about a year before Epstein’s conviction in 2014. The termination was related to a lawsuit seeking to recover over $71,000 in unpaid bills, which Epstein eventually paid.

The motive behind the burglary at Sitrick’s office is now being questioned, as it occurred in close proximity to the unsealing of court documents. While Sitrick vehemently denies any connection, the timing of the burglary raises suspicions. The Los Angeles Police Department is currently investigating the incident, but specific details have not been disclosed to the public. The stolen computers could potentially hold valuable information related to Epstein’s case, adding significance to the investigation.

The burglary has attracted public attention and renewed interest in the Epstein case. The motive behind the burglary could be to obtain sensitive information, raising concerns about the security of such information. This incident underscores the need for heightened security measures in offices handling sensitive cases. The ongoing investigation will shed light on any potential connections between the stolen computers and Epstein, providing valuable insights into the motive behind the burglary and its possible links to the unsealed court documents.