Controversy Erupts Over False Answers: Kim Hong-il Faces Public Investigation

Kim Hong-il Faces Controversy Over False Answers, Demands Public Investigation

Kim Hong-il, the candidate for the chairman of the Broadcasting and Communications Commission, is facing criticism for providing false answers during his confirmation hearing in the National Assembly. In his written response, Kim stated that he had not appointed any lawyers in the past 10 years. However, it has been confirmed that he appointed a lawyer from the law firm Pyeongsan in November 2017.

The Seoul Western District Court imposed a fine of 50 million won on Kim Hong-il in November 2017 for violating civil law. The fine was related to his failure to register as the representative director of a corporation. Although Kim Hong-il assumed the position of CEO of Corporation A in June 2017, he failed to complete the registration by the legal deadline of July 19.

It is speculated that the corporations where Kim Hong-il served as the CEO, such as Orion, Kyongryong Construction, and KAL Industry, were of a different nature from the companies where he served as an outside director while working as a lawyer after retiring from the prosecution.

In January 2018, Kim Hong-il submitted an objection to the fine decision and appointed a lawyer from the law firm Pyeongsan as his legal representative. However, the Seoul Western District Court rejected the imposition of a penalty considering the violation circumstances on December 3 of the same year.

Allegations of False Answers in the National Assembly Confirmation Hearing

Despite being a relatively recent incident, Kim Hong-il is facing allegations of providing false answers during the National Assembly confirmation hearing. This accusation raises concerns about his integrity and honesty as a candidate for the chairman of the Broadcasting and Communications Commission.

There are suspicions that Kim Hong-il provided false answers to conceal his involvement in the lawsuit. Such allegations undermine the trust and credibility of Kim as a candidate for a significant role.

Significance of this Case and Request for Investigation

The allegation of lying during the National Assembly confirmation hearing calls for a thorough investigation into Kim Hong-il’s background and qualifications. It once again emphasizes the importance of transparency and honesty in the selection process of public officials.

This accusation also raises doubts about the effectiveness of the public official verification process and may lead to further investigation into Kim Hong-il’s past records and statements. Ensuring accountability and transparency in the appointment of public officials is essential.

Impact on Trust and Confidence

If the allegations of lying during the National Assembly confirmation hearing about Kim Hong-il are proven true, he may face legal consequences. This can have a negative impact on the overall integrity of the public official selection process and raise concerns about the trustworthiness of those in power.

Conclusion

The controversy surrounding Kim Hong-il’s false answers during the National Assembly confirmation hearing has significant implications for his suitability as the chairman of the Broadcasting and Communications Commission. It highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and honesty in public service.

The outcome of the investigation into these allegations will determine Kim Hong-il’s future course, and it may have a broad impact on the appointment and candidate recommendation process in the field of broadcasting and communications.